ATO tax debt collection differs depending on whether the taxpayer is an individual or a company.
The first few steps are generally the same – phone calls, letters, perhaps a garnishee notice. For a company, the ATO may also issue a Director Penalty Notice to the directors, making them personally liable for unpaid PAYG withholding and superannuation.
The longer a debt goes unpaid, the more likely the ATO is to escalate its debt collection beyond these measures and take legal action through the courts.
For a company debt, the first step in the legal action will be for the ATO to prepare a statutory demand under section 459E of the Corporations Act (also known as a Form 509H). Here’s an example of the first page of a statutory demand.
There should also be some attachments to the statutory demand. These should be a list that details the company’s debt and an affidavit from an ATO officer about how they gathered the information about the debt.
Once the ATO has prepared the statutory demand, it has to serve it on the company. It does this in one of three ways:
This can be a bit of a trap. A company’s registered office is the address that is on the ASIC register. Quite often, I see situations where a company may have moved, and told the ATO about the new address but not updated the ASIC register.
When the ATO sends the statutory demand to the company, it has to send it to the ASIC registered office – this is a specific requirement of the law that governs companies. It doesn’t matter if the ATO has a different address on file for the company.
If you haven’t updated your company’s registered office on the ASIC register, then you may never receive the statutory demand. This can cause problems for the company down the track.
A company has 21 days from the date of service to sort things out. This means that the company should do one of the following within 21 days:
If the company doesn’t successfully do one of these things within 21 days, then it is presumed to be insolvent.
Usually, if a tax debt has gotten to the point where the ATO has issued a statutory demand, the company does not have the money to pay the debt in full.
This means that a payment plan is often the best bet for dealing with the statutory demand.
When you make a payment plan proposal to the ATO, it may insist on having business viability information provided in order to assess the company’s position. The type of information you should be ready to provide includes:
The ATO will use this information to assess what sort of payments the company can realistically afford and whether the proposed plan is suitable.
The ATO wants to see the debt paid off in the shortest time possible. If it looks like it will take the company several years to pay off the debt, then it will be very hard to negotiate a plan.
The ATO may be willing to grant a longer than usual payment plan if you are able to offer security over an asset. For example, if the company owns the building from which it operates, the ATO may be willing to take a first or second mortgage over it to secure the payment of the debt.
One avenue to address ATO tax debt collection involves seeking to invalidate the statutory demand. This approach is typically pursued when there is a substantial legal basis, although it requires careful consideration due to potential court costs. Additionally, if the application is unsuccessful, the applicant may be responsible for covering the ATO’s court-related expenses.
An appropriate reason for pursuing this course of action is the identification of a significant flaw in the demand. Success in this endeavor relies on demonstrating that the flaw is severe enough to lead to ‘substantial injustice’ if not corrected, which is a stringent criterion to satisfy.
Companies often resort to this strategy when there is a genuine dispute over the debt. However, contesting ATO tax debt collection through statutory demands proves challenging due to the unique status of most tax liabilities. Tax law dictates that the issuance of an assessment serves as ‘conclusive evidence’ of debt, posing a significant obstacle to dispute resolution.
In certain cases, flaws in the statutory demand may necessitate its withdrawal by the ATO. These errors could range from incorrect addresses to inaccuracies in the stated amounts or procedural missteps that render the demand invalid.
There are a few other things you should consider. For example:
When I help companies that have received a statutory demand, the answer is usually “yes” to at least one of the above questions. This is why expert advice is so important. The issues exposed by a statutory demand are usually quite complicated and you need the right expertise to be able to address them.